LW Logo  Precious Water in a Glass, ©1999 by Alice Clark logo: clark
c: [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Protect Lake Whatcom ---
---It's Our Drinking Water
rainbow-bar divider

Goal Statements for the Lake Whatcom Program
1991 - City - County - WD10

The following 21 goals were adopted as an attachment to the 1992 Joint Resolution signed by the City of Bellingham, Whatcom County, and Water District 10 legislative bodies.

(*) Full-text of the Specific Goals Statements are available.

What has been done?
(this column added Nov 2006...
to highlight specific,
measurable actions...)

How are they doing?
Scorecard by this site:

Public Involvement and Education: Actions:
 
(1) Goal: To develop and incorporate mechanisms which:
  • provide information regarding individual actions which can reduce or mitigate urban impacts;
  • provide educational formats for describing water quality and quantity issues;
  • provide opportunity for public participation in developing the management program and policies for the lake; and
  • utilize enforcement actions as opportunities for education and learning.
A City PR person was hired; some brochures prepared. A feeble webpage is posted in the FAQ.
An advisory committee on land acquisition was appointed by CoB; then disbanded. I am told another one was started, but who are they, and what do they do?
One Sheriff's boat runs in the summer. (Unsure what WQ actions that can accomplish?)

Score=
CoB: "C"
WC: "D"
LWWSD: "F"

(does this separation help?)
Watershed Ownership: Actions:
 
(2) Goal: To pursue public ownership and protection of the watershed whenever possible through public/private partnerships, tax incentives, transfer of development rights, land trusts, grants, etc. This was the topic of our 1999 Initiative. A limited version was passed by CoB about a year later, and properties have been bought by the City. The County and Sudden Valley have also acquired lands. There are still many acres that could be held in perpetual forestry.

Score= "B"

Information/Data Management:    
(3) Goal: To coordinate with appropriate agencies to maintain and expand a data base sufficient for detection of trends, assessment of problems, evaluation of actions, and forming management decisions that ensure protection and enhancement efforts are achieved. (Detection - assessment - evaluation - ensure? I have not seen such a database.)

Score= "D"

Water Quality Protection and Enhancement:

Forest Practices
Actions:
 
(4) Goal: To promote low impact forest practices in the watershed over residential development while working to ensure that forest management practices are conducted in harmony with the principles of a drinking-water reservoir.
  • pursue zoning and development incentives to retain lands in long term forestry; and
  • develop and maintain a comprehensive watershed forest management plan which minimizes cumulative impacts on the drinking water reservoir.
(I have not seen either -- zoning and development incentives -- nor -- the comprehensive watershed forest management plan. Logic suggests that almost all the forest is in the County, except the 15 City acres purchased near Silver Beach. )

Score= "F"

Hazardous Materials Actions:
 
(5) Goal: To ensure that potential for water quality contamination associated with the use and transport of hazardous materials in the watershed is minimized.
  • restrict and/or designate the route of transport for certain kinds of hazardous materials within the watershed;
  • implement a hazardous materials spill prevention program involving improvements in road design, traffic speed modification, and hazardous material transportation routing restrictions;
  • develop an identification and reporting system consistent with state and federal guidelines; and
  • coordinate information sharing among agencies, citizens, local government, and emergency responders to optimize response time to water quality threats.
There was action by local and state agencies when the sewer interceptor overflowed and created "Fitz Creek" in 2000.

(Tell us about the other recommended components!)

Score= "D"

(6) Goal: To reduce adverse water quality impacts from storage and handling of hazardous materials within the watershed.
  • identify the various sources and areas of concern (i.e., auto wrecking yards, underground storage tanks, etc.);
  • evaluate effectiveness of existing regulations and policies to adequately address concerns;
  • recommend and implement additional actions as appropriate (i.e., restrict or condition certain types of activities); and
  • educate users on hazardous materials alternatives, use, and disposal with an emphasis on avoidance of use of hazardous materials in the watershed.
There is still a farm and what looks like a trucking business in Silver Beach.

Score= "F"

Nutrient Loading and Other Potential Threats: Actions:
 
(7) Goal: To identify other sources of nutrient loading and other threats and implement measures to minimize impacts on the lake. It is now well known that lawn fertilizers are one of the prime sources of chemicals which affect the water quality, via reduced D.O. The only action that has been taken to reduce these is the availability of the lake-friendly fertilizer blend. No report has been made of its utilization.

Score= "D"

Recreation: Actions:
 
(8) Goal: To allow recreational opportunities which do not adversely impact the watershed or water quality while finding appropriate ways to reduce impacts of existing activities. Fossil-fueled engine and exhaust chemicals are known contaminants and carcinogens. A puny rule to long-term reduction of some engines was passed.

Score= "D"

Solid Waste: Actions:
 
(9) Goal: To ensure that the generation, handling, storage, or disposal of solid waste does not degrade water quality.
  • Prohibit the development of landfills within the watershed;
  • Direct the Health Department to assess the ‘Y’ Road landfill contributions to water quality degradation;
  • Prohibit the on-site burial of waste within the watershed [state regulations currently exempt single family residences and single family farm engaged in on-site solid waste handling]; and
  • Promote education efforts directed at the proper disposal of waste, and use of the household hazardous waste facility.
The closure of the County's infamous "Y" Road landfill was purposely done in a rush, to stay under obsolete standards, without any work to either improve the linings nor to evaluate the nature of materials dumped there.
After a citizen complaint to the State, it was given a cursory look by the State and County, and some local residential wells and shallow boreholes have had water quality tested. I have never seen a summary report; I have never seen work to identify/rule-out deep seepage into the aquifers which discharge into the lake.

Score= "F"

Spill Response: Actions:
 
(10) Goal: To ensure that spill prevention and response programs adequately protect water quality.
  • Improve spill response program to ensure that a communication network associated with spill occurrences is clearly defined, tested and implemented.
What? Where? When? By Whom?

Score= "D" or "F"

Stormwater: Actions:
 
(11) Goal: Prevent water quality degradation and water quantity impacts associated with stormwater runoff.
  • Adopt and implement stormwater management standards and maintenance practices that include control of off-site impacts, the use of source control and treatment, Best Management Practices (BMPs), erosion and sediment control, and operation and maintenance (O&M);
  • Control development density and location;
  • Phase in a stormwater management program for existing development, including treatment of discharges;
  • Evaluate options which can be applied to both existing and new development to reduce impacts on water quality, including vegetation management, education, and cost incentives; and
  • Require maintenance of stormwater treatment devices and facilities.
The City passed the Silver Beach Ordinance, which limits impervious surfaces for all new development, enforces seasonal limits on land disturbance activities and other important features. . There has been some installation of stormwater retrofit projects in the Silver Beach area, The County has done work on a Cable Street facility.
New City developments now include stormwater detention gadgets.
The City says they are the best available, but, who knows how well they work? Where is a real QC program, with measurement of chemical quality on the discharge side of these installations?

Score= "C-"

Transportation: Actions:
 
(12) Goal: To design and develop transportation and traffic systems within the watershed to minimize the impacts on water quality.
  • Promote the development and use of mass transit, and other alternative transportation systems that minimize detrimental impacts of traffic within the watershed;
  • Design major routes and transportation lines so that they are not located adjacent to the lake or in a location/design that does not allow for adequate treatment prior to entering the lake;
  • Ensure road drainage systems for existing and new roads minimize water quality impacts;
  • Evaluate and implement actions which minimize the number and use of roads which lie adjacent to the lake (i.e., reduce ‘through traffic’ by making appropriate road dead ends); and
  • Provide ongoing evaluation of effects of transportation on feeder streams, surrounding wetland and the lake.
The WTA restarted (token) bus service to Sudden Valley.
Thank goodness the infamous plan for a new connector road was shelved.
There have been no new dead ends established.
There is no evaluation program.
The City now runs a street-sweeper, which picks up some contaminants before they can wash into the Lake.

Score= "D"

Urbanization/Development: Actions:
 
(13) Goal: Prevent water quality degradation associated with development within the watershed.
  • Review and recommend changes in zoning and development potential that are compatible with a drinking-water reservoir environment;
  • (In addition to zoning) identify and promote other actions to minimize potential for increased development in the watershed (i.e., land trust, development rights, cost incentives, etc.);
  • develop specific standards which reduce the impacts of urbanization, such as minimal lot clearing; clustered development to reduce infrastructure; collection and treatment of stormwater before entering the lake; and
  • develop appropriate interlocal agreements with governing agencies to prohibit the potential for additional development once an agreed upon level is set.
The TDR programs results have been nil.
One proposal for a subdivision on the north shore was shelved.
No agreed upon "level" has been set.

Score= "F"

Wastewater Systems (Sewer and On-Site Waste Systems): Actions:
 
(14) Goal: To prioritize the utilization of sewers over on-site systems in a manner consistent with management principles for a drinking-water reservoir environment. We have not seen such a program, not even a formal restatement of these principles by any of the governments.

Score= "F"

(15) Goal: To ensure that sewer systems promote, improve and protect water quality without promoting growth.
  • Prevent direct discharge of sewage from sewer systems; and
  • Review appropriate sites and promote extension of sewer systems into areas with septic system problems.
Only the big "interceptor" on LL Road, which replaced the small one on LW Boulevard has been installed - itself controversial as it provided the inherent ability for a substantial increase in urbanization!
No new local and collector sewer lines have been installed since about 1985.

Score= "F"

(16) Goal: To ensure that accidental or intentional discharges of hazardous materials and other contaminants to septic systems serving domestic and commercial facilities do not adversely impact water quality.
  • Establish a complaint response system that would prioritize action on complaints within the Lake Whatcom watershed;
  • Develop and implement an operational permit system for all septic systems within the watershed;
  • Conduct a more intensive survey at the older seasonal residences as recommended in the Septic System Survey conducted by the Health Department in 1990;
  • Encourage proper use and maintenance of systems through public education, system monitoring and regulation enforcement;
  • Eliminate the use of hazardous septic system cleaners in the watershed; and
  • Identify existing and potential new commercial facilities within the watershed that use hazardous materials and evaluate, recommend and implement management plans to prevent impacts on water quality.
We are told that an inspection program for all LWW septic systems is in the works. We need to hear reports of the results of such a program.
We have not heard of any citizen complaints about individual failing septic systems. (Tell us, County Health, and prove us wrong!)

Score= "D"

Supply/Quantity Management:    
Conservation Actions:
 
(17) Goal: To promote the wise and efficient use of water through conservation for domestic, industrial, and commercial users. Where is any general conservation program?
One good program is the spots for future meters, with new construction.

Score= "D"

Diversion Operation for Reservoir Management Actions:
 
(18) Goal: To manage or reduce the diversion of water from the Nooksack River and Lake Whatcom in a manner consistent with water resource laws and to the extent possible, minimizes impacts on beneficial uses within the Nooksack Basin, with a particular emphasis on fisheries. We gained a coincidental use-reduction when GP shut most of its operations.

Score= "B"

Recharge Actions:
 
(19) Goal: Where it does not conflict with water quality goals and objectives, identify and promote beneficial recharge practices within the watershed and assist in maintaining supplies for all beneficial uses (e.g., stream buffers, encouraging minimum impervious surfaces within watershed, etc.).
  • monitor stream quality, flow and fisheries as a method of early detection of impacts to water quality.
No recharge practices program - neither residential nor global.
The closest is the CoB SB ordinance for impervious surfaces.
No stream monitoring.

Score= "F"

Demand: Actions:
 
Distribution/Availability within the County

(20) Goal: Given the importance of Lake Whatcom and its Middle Fork Diversion as a source of water supply, and the limited availability of alternative sources to support anticipated growth in the county, establish a process to determine the extent to which the Lake Whatcom reservoir water should be made available beyond the Bellingham Urban Area.
As part of the WRIA-1 Program, water needs and rights have been tabulated, county-wide.
Furnishing of City water to County properties has been largely curtailed, a good move - pending full GMA and urban-infill and expansion policies.

Score= "C"

Other: Actions:
 
Fish and Wildlife

(21) Goal: Promote actions and programs that protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat to include:
  • design culverts and bridges over streams which do not prohibit passage of fish;
  • promote and encourage actions to correct areas where fish passage problems are already existing;
  • maintain, protect and re-create stream buffers; and
  • regulate stream flow to reduce scouring and sediment deposition.
We are not aware of any actions. The agencies are encouraged to publicize them, and tell us.

Score= "F"

---:::|:::---

(*) Full-text of the Specific Goals Statements are available.
Update note - 2006 (Twelve years after passage of this Resolution!)

You - the public - are asked to contribute to this ScoreCard. There is NO WAY that one person, the webmaster alone, can keep up-to-date on the myriad aspects of this challenge.

If you know of an activity which benefits the Lake, please report it in a verifiable way, and (to help immensely the update task) when you report it say WHICH GOAL it applies to.

Some elected officials have replied to this call. Their unedited reports are here on a sub-page.

Thanks,
leave a message for the webmaster

The Initiative Group -- Whatcom
Our bottom-line principles are:
Protect the water supply in perpetuity -- maintain ecological viability of the lake for natural species -- distribute the financial burden fairly among those benefitting -- take immediate action if prudent -- take definitive action -- avoid actions which cut off future options.
-------------
1992 Resolution
Back to the LW HomePage

leave a message from the website

page URL: href="LakeWhatcom.org/goals21score.htm"
Bellingham, Washington 98226 --- The Fourth Corner of the USA
table expanded Nov 26, 2006 -- last edited Dec 23, 2006 -- mgb
c: [an error occurred while processing this directive]